Skip to content
Journal Modern Blog

Venezuela Is Poised to Define Trump's Legacy - and America's Position in the Global Order

In the wake of executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be getting into the nation-building arena.

In a striking media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the president stated that US forces had successfully seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then said that a group comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "governing the state" entails is uncertain, but the pledge marks an dramatic policy reversal for the president, rife with contradictions and daunting challenges.

A leader who ran on opposing "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America First" international policy is now betting his presidency on effectively reconstructing a South American nation whose economy is in ruins and whose governmental stability has been eroded by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was persistently upbeat.

He said his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no different. He pledged to enlist American energy companies to repair Venezuela's deteriorating industrial infrastructure, supplying financing for the American reconstruction efforts and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has redefined Venezuela's future – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is more than willing to use armed force worldwide.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

In contrast to past actions, which have largely involved rockets and warplanes that reduce the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are strikingly distinct.

His aim, he said during his press conference, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Domestic and International Reaction

That variation of Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra may be hard for some of Trump's followers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of deserting his core supporters, was swift to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's endless military aggression and support of foreign wars is justified because we are forced to pay for it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and warranted".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" agenda because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The goal of the new US security policy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, land and assets that are fundamental to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "backyard."

Trump's decision to capture Maduro will raise larger questions in international relations, however, and affect American relations with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese government issued a statement expressing surprise and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible attack on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered comparable censures of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, expressed worry about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"America should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry catastrophic consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's decision not to inform legislative leaders before initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First requires."

Trump, in his remarks, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" details of the operation before the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That military operation was a triumph – with no American casualties and minimal harm to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic bravado, described the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is staking his legacy on that victory enduring, as the US says it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unknown. He and his administration must fortify a nation that has been in chaos for decades while calming a region that is bound to be wary of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

By

Mary Lam

Elara is a cultural commentator and freelance writer with a passion for exploring how technology and society intersect in the modern world.

Journal Modern Blog

Type to search articles.